Comments on: Using Value Objects in Fitnesse With Nested Tables http://blog.james-carr.org/2006/12/03/using-value-objects-in-fitnesse-with-nested-tables/ Rants and Musings of an Agile Developer Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:08:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Powers http://blog.james-carr.org/2006/12/03/using-value-objects-in-fitnesse-with-nested-tables/#comment-74623 Powers Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:08:31 +0000 http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=56#comment-74623 That is very cool! Have you noticed whether there is a performance benefit to using inner_table defines vs defining tables in separate pages and using !include? I say this because I have noticed that using too many !defines on a single page causes serious page load performance degradation in FitNesse. !includes are expensive too, but I don't yet know which one is more costly. That is very cool! Have you noticed whether there is a performance benefit to using inner_table defines vs defining tables in separate pages and using !include?

I say this because I have noticed that using too many !defines on a single page causes serious page load performance degradation in FitNesse. !includes are expensive too, but I don’t yet know which one is more costly.

]]>