<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theory P and Theory D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/</link>
	<description>Rants and Musings of an Agile Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reg Braithwaite</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/#comment-26231</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg Braithwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=88#comment-26231</guid>
		<description>I agree that the linked post is typical of &quot;that guy.&quot;

Any post about the beliefs and behaviours of humans in a social setting is necessarily a simplification. The point of such simplification sis to provide useful strategies for making our own choices.

Some simplifications are oversimplifications: they ignore crucial elements that are necessary to understand in order to make good choices.

I encourage everyone who believes the linked post is an &quot;oversimplification&quot; to elaborate, to correct, to provide critical feedback. This would be helpful for everyone. To simply say that it is an oversimplification... can I say it oversimplifies a critique?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the linked post is typical of &#8220;that guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Any post about the beliefs and behaviours of humans in a social setting is necessarily a simplification. The point of such simplification sis to provide useful strategies for making our own choices.</p>
<p>Some simplifications are oversimplifications: they ignore crucial elements that are necessary to understand in order to make good choices.</p>
<p>I encourage everyone who believes the linked post is an &#8220;oversimplification&#8221; to elaborate, to correct, to provide critical feedback. This would be helpful for everyone. To simply say that it is an oversimplification&#8230; can I say it oversimplifies a critique?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Carr</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/#comment-26221</link>
		<dc:creator>James Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=88#comment-26221</guid>
		<description>Fixed. I picked the link up off a mailing list email someone had sent, which preceded the link with &quot;via Tim Bray&#039;s blog.&quot; Just to add to my confusion I suppose. ;)

Thanks,
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed. I picked the link up off a mailing list email someone had sent, which preceded the link with &#8220;via Tim Bray&#8217;s blog.&#8221; Just to add to my confusion I suppose. <img src='http://blog.james-carr.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael Gueck</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/#comment-26197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael Gueck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=88#comment-26197</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not Tim Bray, it&#039;s Reginald Braithwaite, and the article is the kind of typical oversimplification that I&#039;ve come to expect from that guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Tim Bray, it&#8217;s Reginald Braithwaite, and the article is the kind of typical oversimplification that I&#8217;ve come to expect from that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

