<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theory P and Theory D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/</link>
	<description>Rants and Musings of an Agile Developer</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reg Braithwaite</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/#comment-26231</link>
		<dc:creator>Reg Braithwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=88#comment-26231</guid>
		<description>I agree that the linked post is typical of "that guy."

Any post about the beliefs and behaviours of humans in a social setting is necessarily a simplification. The point of such simplification sis to provide useful strategies for making our own choices.

Some simplifications are oversimplifications: they ignore crucial elements that are necessary to understand in order to make good choices.

I encourage everyone who believes the linked post is an "oversimplification" to elaborate, to correct, to provide critical feedback. This would be helpful for everyone. To simply say that it is an oversimplification... can I say it oversimplifies a critique?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the linked post is typical of &#8220;that guy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Any post about the beliefs and behaviours of humans in a social setting is necessarily a simplification. The point of such simplification sis to provide useful strategies for making our own choices.</p>
<p>Some simplifications are oversimplifications: they ignore crucial elements that are necessary to understand in order to make good choices.</p>
<p>I encourage everyone who believes the linked post is an &#8220;oversimplification&#8221; to elaborate, to correct, to provide critical feedback. This would be helpful for everyone. To simply say that it is an oversimplification&#8230; can I say it oversimplifies a critique?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Carr</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/#comment-26221</link>
		<dc:creator>James Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=88#comment-26221</guid>
		<description>Fixed. I picked the link up off a mailing list email someone had sent, which preceded the link with "via Tim Bray's blog." Just to add to my confusion I suppose. ;)

Thanks,
James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fixed. I picked the link up off a mailing list email someone had sent, which preceded the link with &#8220;via Tim Bray&#8217;s blog.&#8221; Just to add to my confusion I suppose. <img src='http://blog.james-carr.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikael Gueck</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2007/07/15/theory-p-and-theory-d/#comment-26197</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikael Gueck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/?p=88#comment-26197</guid>
		<description>It's not Tim Bray, it's Reginald Braithwaite, and the article is the kind of typical oversimplification that I've come to expect from that guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not Tim Bray, it&#8217;s Reginald Braithwaite, and the article is the kind of typical oversimplification that I&#8217;ve come to expect from that guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
