<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Search Engine: Cuil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.james-carr.org/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-cuil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-cuil/</link>
	<description>Rants and Musings of an Agile Developer</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://blog.james-carr.org/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-cuil/#comment-90823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.james-carr.org/2008/07/28/new-search-engine-cuil/#comment-90823</guid>
		<description>Yeah, i like that smart auto-suggest feature too. I don't like its three-column search result layout though. well, maybe im just being used to Google's interface. Another new search engine Find.com is trying to get in the scene too. Will it be a better alternative?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, i like that smart auto-suggest feature too. I don&#8217;t like its three-column search result layout though. well, maybe im just being used to Google&#8217;s interface. Another new search engine Find.com is trying to get in the scene too. Will it be a better alternative?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
